Archive for March 29th, 2021

Wevelgem & Catalunya Breakdown: Wout and Ineos Domination?

03/29/2021 12:04

Race Breakdown: Another exciting weekend with the top battles in Belgium and Spain. Spencer Martin breaks down the action from Gent-Wevelgem and the Volta Ciclista a Catalunya and gives us his takeaways, the good, the bad and what it all means for the season.

– This article is an excerpt from the Beyond the Peloton newsletter. Sign up here for full access. –

Wout van Aert – Unstoppable in Wevelgem

Wout van Aert won the cobbled classic Gent-Wevelgem with ease in a reduced bunch sprint out of an elite group of fast-men, with Italian duo Giacomo Nizzolo and Matteo Trentin rounding out the podium. Patience was key after strong cross-tail winds split the race up early, especially in the absence of rival Mathieu van der Poel and the entirety of the Trek-Segafredo and Bora-Hansgrohe teams, and Van Aert played the waiting game to perfection in the final 50-kilometers.

Catalunya domination from INEOS

Meanwhile, across the Pyrenees, Ineos wrapped up their domination of the Volta Ciclista a Catalunya, with Adam Yates winning the first European WorldTour stage race of his career and his teammate Richie Porte and Geraint Thomas coming in 2nd and 3rd overall. Yates was far and away the best rider across both the climbs and time trials all week, and his definitive victory over Ineos leaders Thomas and Richard Carapaz will force the British squad to reconsider their Tour de France strategy and potentially make some difficult decisions before June.

Wonderful Wout!

Gent-Wevelgem Takeaways:
The Good

  • Wout van Aert gets a very impressive win, oddly his first career WorldTour win in Belgium, with a devastating sprint, but also some very cerebral race tactics and an impressive amount of patience.
  • He got little support from his Jumbo teammates in the critical points of E3 on Friday, but today his teammate Van Hooydonck was the man of the match. He not only dropped the fastest sprinter in the front group, but his continued presence there meant Van Aert didn’t have to chase down attacks himself and could sit back and save energy for the sprint.
  • This performance supports the theory that his late-race struggles on Friday were possibly due to a hunger knock as he missed a bottle feed at 31km-to-go rather than structural issues with his form.

Lotto, DSM and Deceuninck (apart from Bennett) missed the boat

The Bad

  • Deceuninck – Quick-Step won on Friday at E3 with overwhelming swarm tactics, but today was a massive disappointment for the squad. It is almost inconceivable that they would put themselves in a position where their only rider in the front group of a Cobbled Classic is Sam Bennett. It is even more shocking when we consider the reason they were caught out were echeloned early in the day, which is their in-house specialty.
  • Even worse is that they looked confused and disoriented during the chase. Instead of making a definite decision to go all-in to pull the front group back, they kept trying to launch counter-attacks to bridge up with small groups to avoid pulling a bunch of riders back up to Bennett. It is a difficult situation for them to manage, but the split-strategy between trying to keep Bennett up-the-road with some of the best Classics riders in the world and contributing to the start-stop pace behind meant they were doomed to lose, and since Bennett was the best bunch sprinter in the race, the risk of hurting his chances by increasing the size of the front group was low.
  • Not only did they fail to get a single rider on the same time as the winner, but their top-placed rider was Yves Lampaert in 14th. This inconsistency mirrors their great day at Omloop, followed by a letdown the next day at Kuurne. The fact they are still struggling to show up every race is concerning with only a week before the biggest race of the Spring, the Tour of Flanders.
  • If DQS had a bad day, EF-Education First and Team DSM were even worse. Both teams have aspiration at the Spring Classics, but DSM’s top rider was Soren Kragh Andersen in 35th and EF failed to get a single rider inside the top-49 places, with rookie Stefan Bissegger nabbing their best placing, at 50th.

Sam Bennett made the split, but…

For Further Consideration

  • A lot will be made of Van Aert out-sprinting the likes of Nizzolo, Colbrelli, and Matthews, but, according to bunch sprint performance data over the last three years, behind Sam Bennett, Van Aert was actually by far the best bunch sprinter in the front group, hence his confidence to take them all to the line.
  • Outside of DQS, it is hard to muster up much serious criticism of the other teams and riders who made the front group. Kung was the only rider that lacked a real chance in the sprint finish, so you could argue he shouldn’t have contributed to the pacemaking after the final climb of the Kemmelberg made it clear the race would come down to the sprint. But, with Van Hooydonck in the front group willing to do whatever it took to keep the race together for Van Aert, it isn’t clear if he could have done anything more to get away solo.
  • Everyone else had at least a non-zero chance of winning in the sprint, and it would have been silly to risk this with a long-range attack that was almost certainly doomed to fail (see: Kung’s attack with 1.7km remaining).
  • Van Aert’s win is impressive, but it will be marked by the absence of Bora-Hansgrohe and Trek-Segafredo, who were pulled from the race due to COVID positives within the team. This meant last year’s winner Mads Pedersen and red-hot Milano-Sanremo champion Jasper Stuyven weren’t able to start. I have to think the race would have played out differently with the inclusion of these two strong teams and possibly wouldn’t have broken up so early.
  • Another rider whose absence was notable was Mathieu van der Poel. He didn’t take the race start for unspecified reasons and his inclusion would certainly have shaped the race. It is hard for me to imagine the front group going over the Kemmelberg intact if he was in the race.
  • From the outside, Van der Poel’s absence might seem like a timely rest, but if we look deeper, it is a big deal. Only a single rider, Philippe Gilbert, has missed Gent-Wevelgem and won the Tour of Flanders since the race was moved to the week prior in 2010. However, Gilbert did race the now-defunct three-day race Driedaagse De Panne in the week leading up to Flanders. Missing six hours of race-pace riding is critical a week before a similar effort.

adam yates
A fine show from Adam Yates on Catalunya stage 3

Volta Ciclista a Catalunya Takeaways
After two thrilling one-week stage races in Paris-Nice and Tirreno Adriatico, it was hard not to be disappointed by the Volta a Catalunya. After Adam Yates’ dominant performance on Stage 3, the general classification was never in doubt.

However, despite this GC monotony, there were a few interesting developments throughout the week:

Ineos dominates but their Tour leadership situation is more ambiguous than ever.

  • Ineos became the first-ever team to finish 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in the final general classification, with Richie Porte and Geraint Thomas filling out the final two podium slots behind Yates.
  • We saw Adam Yates’ time trailing and climbing better than we’ve ever seen before, which will have implications for the team’s Tour de France leadership battle. When Ineos released their 12-man Tour longlist a few months ago, they said Richard Carapaz, Geraint Thomas, and Tao Geoghegan Hart would be splitting leadership and that Yates wouldn’t be heading to the race.
  • After this week, where we saw Carapaz struggle to climb with the front group at times and Thomas fail to time trial on the same level as Yates and Porte, the team has to be reconsidering their strategy internally and possibly even regretting calling their shot so early in the year. If they change leadership now, there will certainly be grumblings from riders like Carapaz and Thomas, where if they would have played their cards close to their chest, it wouldn’t appear as though they are changing their strategy on-the-fly.
  • With the Yates twins, Simon and Adam, taking the start lines on different teams for the first time in their careers, we got the unique sight of a head-to-head Yates battle. At least for the moment, it appears that Adam is a rider reborn while Simon struggled all week, coming in 8th overall and over a minute behind his twin. This is notable since Simon has always been the better stage racer, and if Adam overtakes his twin in this discipline, we will have compelling evidence that Ineos’ training ethos and system are truly superior to the rest of the peloton.

INEOS Grenadiers top three, but…

The GC Pretenders Disappoint

  • The start list wasn’t riddled with GC stars, but there were plenty of riders who are considered elite climbers and threats in overall classification. But, they were absolutely steamrolled by Ineos, who while strong, certainly wasn’t full of riders were considered locks to dominate. Geraint Thomas hasn’t won a stage race since his Tour victory in 2019, Richie Porte hasn’t won a European stage race since Tour de Suisse in 2018 and Adam Yates’ biggest stage race win prior to this was the 2020 UAE Tour.
  • These are strong riders, but certainly not destroyers. Riders like Hugh Carthy, Sepp Kuss, Joao Almeida, Simon Yates, Nairo Quintana, Mike Woods, Enric Mas, and Rigoberto Uran have to be doing some introspection after failing to put up any significant fight in the GC and we should keep this in mind when building a list of favorites for future stage races.
  • This is a great win for Adam Yates, but success at Catalunya doesn’t automatically mean success later in the year. In the last 10 editions, only two riders have gone on to win a grand tour in the same season they won Catalunya.

Adam Yates – Winner or worker at the Tour?

Sagan is peaking at just the right time.

  • Peter Sagan got his first professional race win since having to postpone his season due to a case of COVID with his impressive sprint victory on Stage 6. This really makes things interesting for next weekend, and considering his Bora team was removed from E3 and Gent-Wevelgem at the last second due to a COVID positive, him racing Catalunya, which initially seemed like a strange decision, is actually the best-case scenario for his buildup for Flanders. Watch for the former three-time World Champion to be a dangerous wildcard next weekend.

Sagan back?

# Spencer Martin is the author of the cycling-analysis newsletter Beyond the Peloton that breaks down the nuances of each race and answers big picture questions surrounding team and rider performance. Sign up now to get full access to all the available content and race breakdowns. #

The post Wevelgem & Catalunya Breakdown: Wout and Ineos Domination? appeared first on PezCycling News.

Categories:PezCycling News

Acer Swift X3 review: Solid specs, including Intel’s dGPU, but build quality disappoints

03/29/2021 12:04
Acer’s Swift 3X has plenty of plus points, including Intel’s discrete Iris Xe MAX graphics and a competitive price, but we’d like to see another USB-C port and a more robust chassis.

Categories:Latest topics for ZDNet in Hardware

Viviani ends 18-month winless streak at Cholet-Pays de la Loire

03/29/2021 12:04
Italian sprinter takes first win since move from Deceuninck-QuickStep to Cofidis

Categories:LIFE AS A HUMAN

Nacer Bouhanni facing disciplinary action after ‘dangerous conduct’ in Cholet sprint

03/29/2021 12:04
Jake Stewart accuses Frenchman of having ‘no brain cells’ after being forced into the barriers

Categories:LIFE AS A HUMAN

What effect does last night’s sleep have on your performance?

03/29/2021 12:04
Sleep better and ride harder with WHOOP

Categories:LIFE AS A HUMAN

Six conclusions from E3 Saxo Bank Classic and Gent-Wevelgem

03/29/2021 12:04
Van Aert bounces back, Deceuninck-QuickStep’s flipping fortunes and Bora-Hangrohe’s lack of COVID-19 perspective

Categories:LIFE AS A HUMAN

Parisotto: If UKAD can’t stick to its charter then it’s not fit for purpose

03/29/2021 12:04
Anti-doping expert highlights moral and ethical problems linked to nandrolone case

Categories:LIFE AS A HUMAN

Bike Frame Size Calculator

03/29/2021 12:03

The Bike Size Calculator is a quick and easy tool to find the correct bike frame size that is right for you. Choose the kind of bike you are interested in and then enter your measurement(s).

Bike Size Calculator

Please enter your inner leg length in centimeters.
Bike Type

Inner Leg Length

Your matching frame size is:


Mountain Bike Size Charts

Road bicycles have overall light frames and thinner tires, made for driving on smooth, paved surfaces like streets, roads, and trails; a few may even manage gravel or dirt roads. Offered in several distinct styles, street bicycles are widely used for racing, touring and cruising.  If you do not have the inseam length on hand the following chart will help you find the correct mountain bike frame size:

in cm
Recommended frame size
in cm / inches
150 – 155 cm 33 – 36 cm / 13″ – 14″
155 – 160 cm 35 – 38 cm / 14″ – 15″
160 – 165 cm 38 – 40 cm / 15″ – 16″
165 – 170 cm 40 – 43 cm / 16″ – 17″
170 – 175 cm 42 – 45 cm / 16.5″ – 17.5″
175 – 180 cm 44 – 47 cm / 17.5″ – 18.5″
180 – 185 cm 46 – 49 cm / 18″ – 19″
185 – 190 cm 49 – 52 cm / 19″ – 20.5″
190 – 195 cm 51 – 56 cm / 20.5″ – 22″

Road Bike Size Chart

Mountain bicycles are intended for all sorts of terrain, from horizontal gravel trails to steep rocky paths. There are three key trends of mountain bicycles: no suspension, front-suspension and complete suspension.  If you do not have the inseam length on hand the following chart will help you find the correct road bike frame size:

in cm
Frame Size
(Performance / Racing)

in cm
Frame Size

in cm
155 – 160 cm 47 – 49 cm 46 – 48 cm
160 – 165 cm 49 – 51 cm 47 – 49 cm
165 – 170 cm 51 – 53 cm 48 – 50 cm
170 – 175 cm 53 – 55 cm 50 – 52 cm
175 – 180 cm 55 – 57 cm 52 – 55 cm
180 – 185 cm 57 – 60 cm 55 – 57 cm
185 – 190 cm 60 – 62 cm 57 – 60 cm
190 – 195 cm 62 – 64 cm 60 – 62 cm

City Bike Size Chart

If you do not have the inseam length on hand the following chart will help you find the correct city bike frame size:

in cm
Recommended Frame Size
in cm
150 – 160 cm 42 – 48 cm
160 – 170 cm 48 – 52 cm
170 – 175 cm 52 – 55 cm
175 – 180 cm 55 – 58 cm
180 – 185 cm 58 – 61 cm
185 – 190 cm 61 – 63 cm
190 – 195 cm 63 – 66 cm

Touring Bike Size Charts

If you do not have the inseam length on hand the following chart will help you find the correct touring bike frame size:

in cm
Recommended Frame Size
in cm
150 – 160 cm 42 – 47 cm
160 – 170 cm 47 – 50 cm
170 – 175 cm 50 – 53 cm
175 – 180 cm 53 – 55 cm
180 – 185 cm 55 – 58 cm
185 – 190 cm 58 – 60 cm
190 – 195 cm 60 – 63 cm

The post Bike Frame Size Calculator appeared first on

GENT-WEVELGEM’21: Wonderful Wout!

03/29/2021 0:03

Race Report: After a tough, wind-swept 250 kilometres, Wout van Aert won the 2021 Gent-Wevelgem. The leader of the Jumbo-Visma team started the day as top favourite and did not disappoint. He won the sprint from a leading group of seven riders who had been off the front for most of the day. Italians took the next three places: Giacomo Nizzolo (Qhubeka-Assos), Matteo Trentin (UAE Team Emirates) and Sonny Colbrelli (Bahrain-Victorious). Michael Matthews (BikeExchange) was fifth.

Wevelgem for Wout

wevelgem map
Tough profile

After a leading group of four: Laurenz Rex, Stefan Bissegger, Daniel Arroyave and Yevgeniy Fedorov made the early break, the peloton exploded due to the strong wind. Twenty riders broke free, including Sam Bennett, Wout van Aert, Sonny Colbrelli, Michael Matthews, Luka Mezgec, Giacomo Nizzolo, Matteo Trentin, Stefan Küng, Danny van Poppel and Timothy Dupont, they soon gained two minutes.

The Gent-Wevelgem peloton passes many war graves on the route

In the peloton, the teams that missed the move had to chase. The wind tore the peloton into echelons. Led by Deceuninck – Quick-Step and Alpecin-Fenix, the gap was narrowed to the Van Aert group. Zdenek Stybar, Davide Ballerini, Oscar Riesebeek and Luke Durbridge tried to cross to the leaders, but it was a hard job.

A dry day for Gent-Wevelgem 2021

On the first climb of the Kemmelberg, the leading group had thinned down, while the Stybar group became a bit larger. Despite support from Yves Lampaert, Oliver Naesen, Søren Kragh Andersen and Gianni Vermeersch, they could not get closer than 30 seconds to the leaders. They had to drop back to a group with Greg Van Avermaet and Arnaud Démare, where the pace slowed. The leading group had a few BikeExchange riders to help Matthews. The difference fluctuated around 1 minute for a long time.

Wout van Aert was in the early break

The second time up the Kemmelberg, Van Hooydonck and Van Aert put the pressure on in the leading group. Only Trentin, Colbrelli, Küng, Matthews, Bennett, Van Poppel and Nizzolo could follow. The nine worked well together and kept the pursuers at more than a minute. An attempt by Lampaert and Vermeersch to make the crossing didn’t work and they dropped back to the thinned peloton with 40 kilometres to go. Due to the work from Alpecin-Fenix ​​and Deceuninck – Quick-Step, the gap was slowly reduced to under a minute.

Philippe Gilbert had to grit his teeth

The last time over the Kemmelberg, and the last climb of the day, was at 35 kilometres from the finish. The leading group stayed intact and saw the first chasing group within 55 seconds, but they did not get much closer. Just after the Kemmel Sam Bennett was in trouble. The Irish sprinter had gone so deep that he was sick on the bike, although he managed to hang on to the leaders.

Chase group for Van Avermaet

The best man won

Twenty kilometres before the finish, the lead of the nine was still at 50 seconds. Anthony Turgis rode away from the chase group as no one was willing to work too hard. In the leading group, a tired Bennett and Van Poppel were dropped due to a sharp attack by Van Hooydonck. Only Van Aert, Küng, Trentin, Colbrelli, Matthews and Nizzolo could follow him with 15 kilometres remaining.

Degenkolb had missed the boat

Last time over the Kemmel

Due to a fire near the finish, the last five kilometres were changed and the total distance was slightly longer than planned. That was no problem for the seven leaders, because they had all the time for the final as the pursuers were no where in sight.

Top favourite – Wout van Aert

The leading group continued to work well, partly due to a strong tailwind. Küng attacked 2 kilometres from the line, but that acceleration had little effect. Van Hooydonck then kept the pace as high as possible for Van Aert. Küng was the first to start the sprint, but was countered by a very strong Van Aert.

Top finish from Van Aert

The Belgian top favourite hit the front and didn’t let anyone come past him. He left European champion Giacomo Nizzolo and his fellow countryman Matteo Trentin in second and third place. Van Aert is the fiftieth Belgian victory in Gent-Wevelgem.

Happy Van Aert family

Race winner, Wout van Aert (Jumbo-Visma): “In the hilly zone I deliberately waited to attack to get as many riders as possible. The cooperation was good and with the team we kept control of the race. Nathan was fantastically strong today. For the last time up the Kemmelberg I gave him as much courage as possible to survive it, because I knew I was going to need him. He is the one who also took Sam Bennett (and Danny van Poppel at 16 out) out. In the final straight he still took the lead to start the sprint. Really chapeau! This victory means a lot to me. I have already won many great races, but in the Flemish races I have often just missed it. I was waiting for this.”

Gent-Wevelgem Result:
1. Wout Van Aert (Bel) Jumbo-Visma in 5:45.11
2. Giacomo Nizzolo (Ita) Qhubeka-Assos
3. Matteo Trentin (Ita) UAE Team Emirates
4. Sonny Colbrelli (Ita) Bahrain Victorious
5. Michael Matthews (Aus) BikeExchange
6. Stefan Küng (Swi) Groupama-FDJ
7. Nathan Van Hooydonck (Bel) Jumbo-Visma at 0:03
8. Dylan van Baarle (Ned) INEOS Grenadiers at 0:52
9. Anthony Turgis (Fra) Total Direct Energie at 0:54
10. Gianni Vermeersch (Bel) Alpecin-Fenix at 1:25
11. Jérémy Lecroq (Fra) B&B Hotels p/b KTM
12. Greg Van Avermaet (Bel) AG2R Citroën
13. Sven Erik Bystrøm (Nor) UAE Team Emirates
14. Yves Lampaert (Bel) Deceuninck – Quick-Step
15. Jack Bauer (NZ) BikeExchange
16. Oliver Naesen (Bel) AG2R Citroën at 1:27
17. Owain Doull (GB) INEOS Grenadiers at 1:52
18. Ivan Garcia Cortina (Spa) Movistar at 1:56
19. Dries Van Gestel (Bel) Total Direct Energie at 1:57
20. Bert Van Lerberghe (Bel) Deceuninck – Quick-Step
21. Michal Golas (Pol) INEOS Grenadiers at 2:00
22. Cyril Lemoine (Fra) B&B Hotels p/b KTM
23. Danny van Poppel (Ned) Intermarché-Wanty-Gobert Matériaux
24. Imanol Erviti (Spa) Movistar
25. Zdenek Stybar (Cze) Deceuninck – Quick-Step at 2:04
26. Maximilian Walscheid (Ger) Qhubeka-Assos at 2:22
27. John Degenkolb (Ger) Lotto Soudal
28. Alexander Kristoff (Nor) UAE Team Emirates
29. Heinrich Haussler (Aus) Bahrain Victorious
30. Aimé De Gendt (Bel) Intermarché-Wanty-Gobert Matériaux.

The post GENT-WEVELGEM’21: Wonderful Wout! appeared first on PezCycling News.

Categories:PezCycling News

Don’t let a bad tech stack hurt employee retention, use these tips to improve worker IT satisfaction

03/29/2021 0:03
Research shows that companies with poor tech tools risk losing employees. Here are 5 ways to improve IT satisfaction in the new, post-pandemic world.

Categories:Latest topics for ZDNet in Hardware

Follow by Email